Join the discussion of how electronic cigarettes work with an old world industrial feel, as E Cig Werks provides commentary, updates and links on all things e-cig. E Cig Werks seeks to add clarity and common sense to the sometimes complicated and cluttered online and retail electronic cigarette industry, along with e-cig affiliate sales links, discounts and more.
If you can possibly manage the time, please vape both cigs at one meeting.
FDA regulation can benefit electronic cigarette growth
Hard as it
is to imagine or say, it’s possible that federal government regulation could
actually be a good thing for electronic cigarettes.
Let me try
to explain this before e-cig supporters and other libertarians fly off the
handle. Hyper-regulation at all levels of government, especially federal,
should make e-cig supporters suspicious of all too common government overreaction.
However, if electronic cigarettes are as beneficial as many believe, then they
should tolerate and work with most of the recently proposed Food & Drug Administration (FDA) regulations and oversight.
specifically, reporting of electronic cigarette ingredients and other proposed reviews
should help to clarify to the public many of the misconceptions due to the misinformation
out there. As e-cig supporters like myself have maintained for years, the
ingredients in e-cigs are pretty well known and documented. These include
varying degrees of nicotine, propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, polyethylene
glycol 400 and flavorings.
If and when
the FDA can show any major health issues or real harm from those ingredients,
then e-cigs can be reasonably regulated.
negative repercussions are significant if e-cig regulation goes overboard,
which is always a possibility with big government. For example, the regulation
of e-cigs should be considered differently than traditional cigarettes when it
comes to their impact in public places like bars and restaurants. With electronic
cigarettes’ big advantage of avoiding second-hand smoke and odor, it’s been my
experience that most people don’t mind their use in public places.
of federal regulators going overboard were recent inflammatory comments by CDC
director Dr. Tom Frieden, who told the Los Angeles Times that e-cigs are a
tobacco product and that he basically hates them. At least, the paper promptly
corrected him noting that e-cigs don’t burn tobacco. Most of his opposition to
e-cigs is based on fear-mongering and insinuations rather than facts.
We need to closely
differentiate key facts and use discretion with electronic cigarette regulation
when comparing them to traditional cigarette public use. Until it’s proven that
there is negative health impact, electronic cigarettes should be permitted in
public places if the property owner or business approves. Some of the biggest
concerns with traditional cigarettes in public are smoke and odor, which are
not really present with electronic cigarette vapor.
marketing standpoint, most e-cig manufactures and marketers are already complying
with the FDA recommendations as they aren’t really marketing to kids under age
21, avoid making health benefit claims and complimentary giveaways in public are
Electroniccigarette opponents use false fears hyping future and potential problems rather
than citing proven facts or the many success stories of those who have used
e-cigs to quit or cut down on tobacco. It seems that the worst thing regulators
can say about e-cigs is that they might attract youth or possibly harm them.
Yet, many of the same regulators are letting products like high caffeine energy
drinks, soda, coffee and other products flagrantly market to young people.
possible that any level of regulation could harm smaller brands or
manufacturers, but that becomes part of the process of allowing more consumers
to benefit from electronic cigarettes.
likely argue that FDA regulations benefit the big tobacco companies with more
money and resources who are now more aggressively getting into the e-cig
market. Hopefully, they have learned lessons from past tobacco advertising
mistakes and can more positively self-regulate electronic cigarette marketing
in the future.
electronic cigarette industry needs to try its best to embrace the body of the
proposed FDA regulations, but also aggressively fight overzealous and emotional
oversight from big government and big health care.
sure seems like an unlikely long shot, there is a chance that the benefits of
e-cigs helping consumers avoid tobacco can outweigh the scare tactics when it
comes to federal and other government regulation.